Case Update :A Legal Cry Against Harassment, Part 2
Institutional Corruption and Gujrat High Court Case - Ahmedabad India
In a recent Special Criminal Application filed before the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad, a deeply troubling series of events has emerged. A senior human resources professional—and a breast cancer survivor—has alleged targeted sexual, financial, and psychological harassment at the hands of senior executives at what is publicly presented as a leading pharmaceutical company. Yet, evidence increasingly points to something far more sinister: a front for international fraud, media manipulation, and questionable fundraising activities, masquerading as a healthcare entity.
Despite filing a formal police complaint on 28 December 2024, no FIR has been registered to date. The lawyer representing the survivor has repeatedly shifted hearing dates without transparency, now abruptly citing 4th July (Case reference - R/SCR.A/7210/2025) as the next step, again, with no explanation. The justice system appears weaponized to delay, dilute, and eventually deny.
Why has no FIR been filed for the alleged control, coercion, and abuse of a vulnerable woman, lured from the UK under pretenses and subjected to ongoing trauma and grave torture? Why does silence prevail despite clear evidence of threats, misrepresentation, and pressure tactics aimed at forcing her to withdraw her complaint?
Who is benefiting from this continued abuse?
Who profits from silencing and harming the victim by draining her finances and enabling the further torture to run around in a less familiar city, and the language barrier?
Who gains from the deterioration of her physical and mental health, her isolation, and being forced under subtle direct or indirect threats?
This is not simply a legal delay—it is systemic complicity. It raises urgent questions about whose interests are being protected through these tactics. When threats are ignored and manipulation is allowed to fester under legal cover, the system itself becomes part of the crime.
The facts and events described point to a deliberate pattern of suppression and systemic failure. Despite a formal complaint outlining serious allegations of sexual, financial, and psychological harassment, no FIR has been filed, suggesting institutional reluctance or external influence obstructing due process. The repeated delays by the lawyer, shifting court dates without explanation, and lack of police action point to coordinated stalling tactics, likely intended to exhaust the victim, dilute the case, and protect the accused.
Moreover, the alleged company's behavior—misrepresented as a legitimate pharmaceutical entity while engaging in deceptive, possibly international fraudulent activities—raises the question: Is this truly a company, or a front for exploitation?
This case highlights a broader, disturbing reality: When systems meant to protect become tools of control, survivors are re-victimized not just by perpetrators, but by the very institutions they turn to for justice.
The silence benefits only those who thrive in impunity—the accused, the complicit legal professionals, and a possibly criminal corporate structure built on manipulation and fear.
This is not just one woman’s fight—it is a mirror to a nation that claims to worship its women while enabling their exploitation behind closed doors. A courtroom that stages justice like theatre, where cruelty and impunity take center stage.
To criminal justice researchers, the independent media, and human rights watchdogs: this is your moment to act. Documents are available. The evidence is real. The silence must be broken, because - “The Cruelty Continues”